Technology

Donald Trump Immigration Issues Show Tech Giants Resistance Result From Lack of Majority Support for President

By on
Donald Trump Immigration Issues Show Tech Giants Resistance Result From Lack of Majority Support for President
PHOTOGRAPH: Hafteh | President Trump faces challenges of his temporary travel ban order.

The travel ban order by the President of the United States has substantially received criticisms from America’s citizens to the country’s tech giants. The many Donald Trump immigration issues to be faced by the administration include the amicus brief by a number of companies and the significant tremor to how the people support the president.

A few days after assuming the presidential position, President Donald Trump announced the travel restrictions for seven Muslim-majority countries including Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, and Yemen. This, along with other executive orders by Trump, awakens many Americans to become politically active.

There have been marches and protests by millions of citizens who do not agree with the decisions made by the POTUS who pledged to be a president for all Americans. The activism of the people also reached businesses that urge them to choose their stance on the matter.

Companies Join Forces

Tech giants from Silicon Valley, brands of American standards like Levi Strauss & Co., and many other companies, have indeed expressed their standpoint. Around 103 companies chose not just to show it through their online presence but to bring it to court with the amicus brief.

Amicus brief is an approach used by outside parties to catch the attention of the court regarding a significant matter. This means about a hundred of companies joined forces in a rare mutual effort in the industry to make it known that the President’s order is affecting them.

The Business Side of Things

It is inevitable for Donald Trump immigration issues to face a backlash especially when the country’s workforce could be hugely affected. According to Joint Venture, around 37 percent of the labor force is from immigrants.

That is why the companies are trying to keep these foreign-born channels because they “make many of the Nation’s greatest discoveries” and “create some of the country’s most innovative and iconic companies” as stated in the brief. And these companies are all too known to us, including Apple, Facebook, Google, Netflix, Microsoft, Pinterest, and Uber.

Meanwhile, the people are effectively making their voices heard. For instance, Uber received a backlash after they suspended a price surge during a taxi strike at JFK airport to protest against the travel ban. Many people were upset with this move and the hashtag #DeleteUber immediately trended with users uninstalling the application from their phones.

Ultimately, Uber’s CEO Travis Kalanick decided to drop out of Trump’s business advisory council. He said in a memo acquired by CNN that his joining the council does not mean “an endorsement” neither of the president nor his agenda yet it has been misunderstood as that.

Even retailers such as Nordstrom and Neiman Marcus that carried Ivanka Trump’s clothing and accessory line announced that they are dropping her fashion collections. It is not an act of defiance against the president’s first daughter, though; just a business move because of their poor sales performance as a result of people’s movement to boycott these brands.

Setting aside the business perspective, the companies’ ideologies and views hugely matter to the customers. The corporate resistance, as part of the many Donald Trump immigration issues, is highly significant as it shows the majority of the citizens do not support the president. And as a businessman himself, the POTUS would surely understand what that means.

Comments

About the author

To Top